Analysis Of The Book 1984 And The Hunger Games

Corrupt governments, totalitarianism, and no recollection of the previous years, can describe not only the book, 1984, but also the book, the Hunger Games. The two books share many similarities, from districts to ministries and thought police to peacekeepers. These books both share a glimpse into the future after a world war. They both predict that the futuristic societies will be separated into parts, the upper class being very wealthy and receiving many advantages, and the lower class working to support themselves and the upper class in terrible working conditions. During both of these novels, their people are constantly being watched, there is surveillance cameras everywhere. These two books share many similarities but the most†¦show more content†¦Every year the capital holds the hunger games, where two people from each of the 12 districts (two per district) compete against each other for lifes. Katniss’ sister Primrose is picked to compete, heroically, Katniss s teps in and competes in her place. Katniss and her partner, Peeta, win the Hunger Games by going against the government. The government becomes very upset with this and is now out to get Katniss and her family. The first similarity that I noticed between the two books would be the characters. Winston portrays the protagonist of the novel, as does Katniss. Winston and Katniss are both figures of rebellion. They are both choosing to rebel against their governments. Neither of them like the principles that their government forces upon them and are willing to do anything to make a change. Ultimately, they both get caught by their governments, and the government also takes their loved ones. Not only doe Winston and Katniss show similarities but so do their significant others, Julia and Peeta. Julia and Peeta do not like the government either, but are not willing to go as far as Winston and Katniss are. Julia and Peeta both love their significant others until they are captured by their go vernments. They are both tortured and trained into hating their significant other and loving the government. Another two characters that are the same would be the antagonists of the books. For 1984, would be Big Brother and for the

Should Americans Use The Electoral College - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 574 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/06/14 Category Politics Essay Level High school Tags: Electoral College Essay Did you like this example? The Electoral College system should not be continued to elect the President of the United States because it is outdated, un-American, and unstable. First, The Electoral College ignores the will of the people and is contrary to the intent of the Framers. Every citizen’s vote should count the same in America, but that is not the reality. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Should Americans Use The Electoral College?" essay for you Create order Whoever receives the most actual votes does not always win the election, yet America calls themselves a democracy. America’s Founders were worried about the popular vote when they wrote the Constitution because citizens in the 1700’s did not have access to information, and they were inclined to vote for someone from their own region. That is irrelevant today in the age of internet and tv. The Founders made the Electoral College because of outdated problems, which are irrelevant problems today so America should not continue to use a system that is outdated. Many people in favor of the Electoral College say that a popular vote would hurt rural areas, but people in rural areas would actually get an equal say to people in cities rather than giving them extra weight in the election. Also, with the easy dissemination of information today, it does not matter if candidates visit these regions. Second, The Electoral College discourages voter turnout and decreases interest in politics and government. Because people know that their vote is irrelevant in areas where they know the outcome of their state in the election will be blue or red, they feel that there is no point in their vote which then discourages them from actually voting. People would also care more about politics if they felt like they had a say. According to NPR, voter turnout is higher in the few undecided states. This shows that if people know that their vote matters, they will go up to the polls and vote. In the 2016 election, The California Trump voters and the Virginia Clinton voters knew their votes would not matter. This proves that when people feel that their voice is not being heard, they are less likely to vote. Therefore, America should have a system where everyone’s vote is counted equally and where people are not uninterested in voting because they know that their vote will matter. Finally, the Electoral College is unstable because it gives too much power to a small number of swing states. Modern presidential campaigns ignore almost all states in favor of a handful of closely divided states. The rest of the country is basically invisible, distorting politics, policy debates, and the distribution of federal funds. In 2016, all public campaign events were held in just six states. This is not only unfair to the majority of states that are being ignored, it is dangerous because there is too much power in a few states. The majority of states are getting no attention to their needs and wants, while the President is favoring the powerful swing states. Also, of the more than 120 million votes, the 2016 election was effectively decided by only 107,000 people in three swing states, while the popular vote favored the losing candidate by about three million votes. This further proves that many people’s votes do not matter, and that small swing states have too much power. It is not suited for modern times, discourages voter turnout, and is unfair to all people who feel that their vote does not matter, therefore the electoral college should be abolished.

Detectives Police and Investigation - 1796 Words

A detective is a police officer, whose duty is to detect criminals, by in-depth investigation of cases. When attempting to solve a crime, detectives conduct a criminal investigation that seeks all the facts about a crime to help determine the truth: what happened and who is responsible. This involves making a preliminary and final investigation. A detective#8217;s task is to gather, organize, and use information about social behavior. To effectively complete that task a detective should possess certain characteristics: intellectual, psychological, and physical. Studies were conducted on the importance and efficiency of the criminal investigation system, and on the need to integrate written policies, and rules. Detectives have many†¦show more content†¦A confession is not always necessary, because sometimes enough incriminating evidence has already been obtained. If there is sufficient evidence or a confession is obtained, then detectives can arrest the suspect. It is t he detective#8217;s job to present the best possible case to the prosecution. After all this occurs the case is disposed of. These steps are not always followed in this exact order, and sometimes steps are eliminated. In conclusion, a detective#8217;s job is basically to clear or dispose of a case (Bennett, 1981). Detectives, when conducting an investigation, should first determine whether a crime has been committed. Thus, a detective who is familiar with the different crimes and their elements (what must occur for an act to be called a specific type of crime), knows immediately if a crime has actually been committed. When a detective receives a case, he or she conducts a preliminary investigation. When establishing a case, a preliminary investigation consists of different aspects. A detective#8217;s job includes such things as measuring, photographing, sketching, and searching the crime scene, as well as identifying, collecting, examining, and processing physical evidence. In addition, a detective questions victims, witnesses, and suspects. They record all statements and observations in their notes. All aspects of the preliminary investigation areShow MoreRelatedPolice Operation : Patrol And Detective1450 Words   |  6 PagesPolice Operation: Patrol and Detective It may seem impossible to sum up the daily job description for a police officer. Police officers have to wear many hats during a career. From conducting traffic stops to making a death notification to a next of kin, the job of a police officer comes with many challenges. There is no such thing as routine patrol in law enforcement. Each day an officer may face a new challenge they have not faced before and how they respond and react may be a matter of lifeRead MoreBringing Adam Home Essay1576 Words   |  7 Pages Abstract Bringing Adam Home  review examines the story of the decades-long investigation into the abduction and murder of 6-year-old Adam Walsh. The police investigation took 27 years to prove guilt of the serial killer, Ottis Toole, who made multiple confessions to the murder. The book is written by the experienced detective writer Les Standiford with the help of the retired detective Joe Matthews, who finally found evidence of Toole’s committing the murder 27 years afterwardsRead MoreA Case Study1745 Words   |  7 PagesMost people would not think of robots helping drugs crime investigators. They thought I was insane, says Richard Soh, Head of Investigation Support at Singapores Central Narcotics Bureau (2017). To help in tranquillize wrongdoing examinations, Soh is portraying the answer from some of his partners when he initially presented utilizing mechanical autonomy. Due to the nations maturing populace, like numerous other government association in Singapore, CNB is confront ing a lack of labour. In theRead MoreFoundations Of Criminal Investigations History1465 Words   |  6 PagesLabmen 09/07/2015 Foundations of Criminal Investigations History Recap I. (1700 s-20th century) The Impact of the Agricultural and Industrial Revolution and Industrial RevolutionsDuring the eighteenth century two events—an agricultural revolution and an industrial revolution, which began a process of change that profoundly affected how police services were delivered and investigations conducted.The roots of America’s system of criminal investigation go back to the towns and cities in EnglandRead MoreEffectiveness Of A Police Officer s Responsibilities1653 Words   |  7 Pagesthe effectiveness of a police officer’s responsibilities, we often wonder if the job that they are doing is adequate in the eyes of the community as well as the department. Why are there so many police officers surrounding that house or car? Where is the police when you really need one? How much money will it cost the city to fund this operation? These are some of the main questions that will be asked at any given time when it comes to examining the effective ness of the police. Often times the citizensRead MoreMarlowe And Sam Spade Analysis1509 Words   |  7 Pagesare two similar characters, who both embody the true spirit of the hardboiled detective genre. However, Marlowe and Spade are also two very different types of characters, especially when it comes to their novel versus cinematic counterparts. Marlowe and Spade’s attitudes on the femme fatales, how they perform during their investigations, and their interactions with others show how different but similar the two detectives are, resulting in both being the classic staples of the genre. Marlowe is aRead MorePolice Officers Vs. Roman Empire1005 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Police officers are required to maintain law and are bound by law themselves. Police functions are about the objective of the police; not what they do. Police provide assistance to the public 24 hours a day 7 days a week. For most people, just knowing that there are police officers driving or walking around it usually makes them feel more secure. Police officers tend to be a positive role model. History One of the earliest known methods of policing was called kin policing;Read MoreA Look at Anycity’s Police Department Shows Many Problems Essay863 Words   |  4 PagesAfter reviewing Anycity’s police department a number of different issues have come to my attention. First, the organization of the police department and the number of supervisors compared to the number of patrol officers and detectives is far too great. With this issue come many unwanted problems. There are too many people in the chain command and this causes information to flow slower, the lack of personal relationship between the top of the chain and those who are at the bottom. Next, this causesRead MorePolice Stations Are The Same908 Words   |  4 PagesNot all police stations are the same. Each police station has a different way of dealing with criminals and incidents in each state. There are a lot of aspects that make up a police station especially the San Diego Police Department. It range s from officers to procedures to Vehicles. Some of these things are The Geographic size of patrol areas/population size, types of vehicles, the number of officers on patrol, arrest procedures, organizational structure, jail and detention, investigation units andRead MorePolice Department And The Department s Records Management System909 Words   |  4 PagesThe Brownwood (Texas) Police Department must show efficiency in the ability to collect, examine, and compare a significant amount of information in order to understand crime issues that affect our community. The department must consistently evaluate and measure the success of our intelligence-led policing capabilities and strategies. Currently the department relies heavily on analyzing the monthly statistics that are submitted to the Uniform Crime Report (UCR), along with monthly intelligence meetings

Fdrs Influence As President Essay Example For Students

Fdrs Influence As President Essay Fdrs Influence As PresidentSome have called him the best president yet. Others have even claimed that he was theworlds most influential and successful leader of the twentieth century. Those claims can be backed up by the overwhelming support that he received from his citizens throughout his four terms in office. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt began a new era in American history by ending the Great Depression that the country had fallen into in1929. His social reforms gave people a new perspective on government. Government was not only expected to protect the people from foreign invaders, but to protect againstpoverty and joblessness. Roosevelt had shown his military and diplomatic skill as the Commander in Chief during World War II. This wartime leadership and international relations policy won him an award in the hearts of many Americans. Roosevelt threw his hat in the ring in 1931 in order to prepare for the election of 1932. Democratic Party chairman James A Farley directed his campaign. He started a nationwide radio address, outlining a program to meet the economic problems of the nation. He coined the term forgotten man to mean all of those who had been hard hit by the evils of the depression. These radio addresses were the start to what he called the fireside chats. Overall, Roosevelt was the most energetic and dynamic candidate, and he was nominated by the party on the fourth ballot. Although he displayed excellent characteristics, his competition was fairly tough. He was up against John Nance Garner of Texas (who would be his Vice Presidential running mate);Newton D. Baker of Ohio, who was former Secretary of War; and former Governor Alfred E. Smith of New York. For three ballots, Roosevelt held a large lead, but lacked the two- thirds margin necessary for victory. Farley then promised John Garner the vice presidential nomination, which he accepted grudgingly. Then FDR took the presidential nomination on the fourth ballot. One of the purposes of the national convention is to bring the party together in a movement of support behind the nominated candidate. Although there was rough competition during the choosing process, most party leaders were happy with the Roosevelt choice. It would help pull votes from the urban-Eastern region of the country. Also, Roosevelt made a dashing introduction at the Chicago convention by being the firstnominee to ever write an acceptance speech. In this speech, he brought emotions from the audience in his last line, I pledge to you, I pledge to myself, to a new deal for the American people. During the November campaign against Hoover, Roosevelt suggested a few parts of the so called New Deal. He spoke of relief and public works money. He wanted todevelop a plan to cut agricultural overproduction. He was for public power,conservation and unemployment insurance. The repeal of prohibition and stock exchange regulation were also big items on his platform. However, other than the aforementioned items, Roosevelt was quite vague about other plans. He mentioned little about his plans for industrial recovery or labor laws. As much foreign policy experience as he had, he talked very little of it during the campaign. Many believe that he was simply trying to home in on the problems that the American public saw most prominent at the time. When it came to election day, Roosevelt was the only viable alternative to Hoover, who many blamed for the Great Depression, although critics argue that it was the presidents preceding the Hoover Administration. The outcome reflected this thinking: Roosevelt won 22,821,857 votes compared to Hoovers 15, 761,841. Roosevelt also won the electoral 472 to 59. The voters had sent large majorities of Democrats to both houses as well, which would enable Roosevelt to accomplish more by pushing through more bills. Roosevelts second election was in 1936. The Democratic National Convention re-nominated him by acclamation no vote was even taken. Vice President Garner wasalso nominated. The Republican opponents were Governor Alfred M. Landon ofKansas and Frank Knox, a newspaper publisher. Republicans, seeing Roosevelts overwhelmingpopularity, were reaching for a tomato to throw. They claimed that he had not kept his promise to the people to balance the budget. Roosevelt replied by pointing to theactions of fighting the depression and returning the nation to prosperity to precedence over the budget. As expected, Roosevelt won by a landslide. He received 27,751,491 popular votes and carried 46 states with 523 electoral votes. His opponent only received 16,679,491 popular votes and 2 states with 8 electorals. This reflected the nations confidence in the man and his leadership ability. However, the nation still had a long way to go. He stated in his inauguration address, I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, and ill-nourished. After another over-all successful term, Roosevelt ran again in 1940. The Democratic Party broke precedent with his re-nomination. There were some party members that felt it was unfair to elect him again, so his margins of popularity fell slightly. This time, he was not the only one up for the nomination. There was James Farley, who received 72 13/30 votes, previous Vice President John Nance Garner, receiving 61 votes; Millard Tydings of Maryland, receiving 9 1/2 votes; and Cordell Hull,former Secretary of State, who received only 5 2/3 votes. Secretary of AgricultureHenry A. Wallace was chosen as a Vice Presidential running mate. The Republicans nominatedWendell Wilkie of Indiana, a corporation president, to oppose the Roosevelt/Wallace team. The two candidates had some similar views. Wilkie supported Rooseveltsforeign policy and favored many New Deal programs already in effect. However, Wilkie opposed the controls that the Democratic Administration had put on business. To obtain more Republican support for this campaign, Roosevelt used his executive power of appointment to appoint two republicans to his Cabinet in 1940. The first was Henry L. Stimson for Secretary of War, who held the office under the Taft Administration. He also held the office of Secretary of State under President Hoover. Stimson replaced Harry Woodring who was regarded as isolationist. Rooseveltsprevious opponent who ran for as Vice President on the republican side, newspaper publisher Frank Knox, was placed as the Secretary of the Navy. The Republicans based their campaign on the tradition that no President had ever gone for a third term in succession. To counter this, Roosevelt put the spotlight on his administrations achievements. Because of the risky situation abroad, many felt that Roosevelts expertise was needed if war occurred. The election results were closer this time than the previous two times. Roosevelt received 27,243,466 popular votes and 449 electoral votes. Wilkie received22,334,413 popular votes and 82 electoral votes. When it was time for Roosevelts third term to end, he initially said he wanted to retire. However, he later declared that he felt it was his duty to serve if his country calledon him. Much of this feeling was based on the idea that it would be a bad thing for the country to change leadership in the middle of the war. Many of the presidents advisors felt he would not live through a fourth term, considering his heart disease, hypertension, and other cardiac problems. Because of his condition, the Vice President nomination forthe 1944 election was of utmost importance. Roosevelt was persuaded to drop Henry Wallace, whom many regarded as too liberal and emotionally unsuited to be president. Harry Truman of Missouri was chosen to fill the spot. Although Roosevelt receivedparty nomination on the first ballot, there were two other candidates: Harry Byrd (89 votes) and James Farleyagain (1 vote). The Republicans nominated Thomas Dewey of New York for President and John Bricker of Ohio for Vice President. Again, their argument was term length. No President should serve for 16 years, they declared. The opposing argument by the Democrats was that no country should change horses in mid-stream. Roosevelt drove around the streets of New York City in a rainstorm and then made a speech to show thathis health was not a major issue. The election outcome was even slimmer this time, but Roosevelt still captured a hearty vote. Roosevelt received 25,602,505 votes and 432 electoral votes and his Republican opponent received 22,013,372 popular votes and 99 electoral votes. Many of the advisers who helped Roosevelt during his presidential campaigns continued to aid him after he entered the White House. Below are the four cabinets: FIRST TERM March 4, 1933-January 20, 1937 POSITION NAME/ STATE DATE OFINDUCTION Secretary of State: Cordell Hull, TN 3/4/33 Secretary of Treasury: William Hartman Woodin, NY 3/4/33 Henry Morganthau, Jr. My Best Friend Argumentative Essay The federal government would withdraw from the direct relief, leaving it up to state and local governments. A program of social reforms would also beincluded in the second half of the New Deal. This would include social security for the aged, unemployed and ill, as well as slum clearance and better housing. One of the first acts of the New Deal, Phase II was the Emergency Relief Act. By Executive Order, Roosevelt created three new relief agencies in 1935. The first wouldbe the Work Progress Administration (WPA), which would spend $11 billion on temporaryconstruction jobs. Schools, theaters, museums, airfields, parks and post offices were constructed as a result. This increased the national purchasing power. Another part of the Emergency Relief Act was the Resettlement Administration (RA). Its goals were to improve the condition of farm families not already benefiting from AAA, prevent waste by unprofitable farming operations or improper land use and projects such as flood control and reforestation. This agency also resettled poor families in subsistence homestead communities. These were basic suburbs constructed for the citys poor workers. Many times, these communities were known as greenbelt towns because of their proximity to open space. Two model suburbs were set up Greenbeltin Washington DC and Greenhills in Cincinnati. Another aid to the farmer was the Rural Electrification Administration (REA). Its goals were to provide electricity to isolated areas where private utility companies did not see it profitable to run lines and set up service. The year of 1935 brought with it numerous reform efforts. These were the final efforts of the New Deal before the nation geared up for war. Included in this was the National Labor Relations Act, whose most important function was to set up the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which monitored corporations to ensure worker rights and safety. The National Housing Act created the US Housing Authority (USHA) to administer low-interest 60-year loans to small communities for slum clearance and construction projects. This agency also gave subsidies to those landlords willing to offer low-income housing. A Revenue Act of 1935 capped off the New Deal with a tax onthe rich, and a tax break on the middle classmen. One of the most important and lasting effects of the Roosevelt Administration was his into push for the Social Security Act of 1935. This was an innovative plan that was supposed to lead to a nation-wide retirement system. It also established a cooperative federal-state welfare system/unemployment system. A tax was levied on theemployee, which was met dollar for dollar by the employer. This tax went into a special fund operated by the Social Security Administration. Later in life, when a person reached retirement, they could draw the money out of this account that they had placedin for the last few decades. The Supreme Court was fairly conservative, and attempted to shoot holes in many of Roosevelts New Deal Programs. It felt that Roosevelt had taken his legislative presidential power to recommend legislation too far, and that Congress was equally responsible for allowing him to usurp the powers for reasons of what Roosevelt claimed was a national emergency. In a statement made in May of 1935, one of the Supreme Court Justices announced that Congress had delegated virtually unfettered powers tothe Administration. something truly inconsistent with the constitutional prerogatives and duties of Congress. The Supreme Court even went as far as to strike the entire AAA program down, claiming that it violated states rights. FDR was infuriated at the actions of the Court. He thought of them as nine old men who were living in days gone by far too conservative to see the economic and social needs of today. He soon began to plan retribution, however in secrecy. Twodays after inviting the Justices to a formal social function at the White House, he called upon his staff to write up the Judicial Reform Act of 1937. Essentially, this document alleged that the Judicial Branch of the federal government was overwhelmed. The Act describeda desperate situation in which reform and recovery issues were not flowing through government on a timely basissimply because the Supreme Court was backed up. His answer to solve the dilemma was to use his executive power of appointment and place more Justices on the Court. Another section of the Act suggested that at age 70 (mostof the Justices were above this age), each Justice would be supplemented with an additionalJustice. This meant up to 15 Supreme Court Justices serving at one time. Roosevelt hoped to load the Court with social liberal Democrats who would not oppose his New Deal Programs. This became known as his Court Packing Scheme. The President can appoint Justices, however, they must be approved by Congress. After a long period of embarrassing debate, the Senate rejected Roosevelts proposal. This, in turn, caused Roosevelt to reject the Senate. He set out on a mission to purge theDemocratic party of the moderate type thinker, replacing him with the ultra-liberal. Roosevelt used his diplomatic and military powers in the later part of his Administration nearly as much as he used his executive and legislative powers in the first half. At the time Roosevelt took office, the nation was suprisingly isolationistic. This started in the late nineteenth century, and continued up to the Roosevelt Administration. When the Great Depression hit in the 1930s, America became even more concernedwith its own problems. However, seeing the importance of a global view and seeing the possible impact of World War II, Roosevelt directed the country toward nations abroad.Roosevelt described his foreign policy as that of a good neighbor. The phrase came to be used to describe the US attitude toward the countries of Latin America. Under the policy, the United States took a stronger lead in promoting good will among these nations. The Platt Amendment of 1901 gave the US the right to intervene in the affairs of Cuba. In May of 1934, the government repealed this amendment. It also withdrew American occupation forces from some Caribbean republics, and settled long- standing oil disputes with Mexico. Roosevelt was the first to sign reciprocal trade agreements with the Latin American countries, including Brazil, Columbia, Costa Rica, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Nicaragua. In 1935, the US signed treaties of non-aggression and conciliation with six Latin American nations. This desire to spread ties across the Western Hemispheres led to reciprocal trade agreements with Canada. Roosevelt also used personal diplomacy by taking trips to various Latin American nations. In July, 1934, he became the first American president to visit South American inhis trip to Columbia. In 1936, he attended the Inter-American Conference for the Maintenance of Peace, in Buenos Aires. Roosevelt used his diplomatic power of recognition to resume trading between the Soviet Union and the US The recognition was given to the Soviet government in November of 1933. This was the first attempt at civil relations since the Russian Revolution in 1917. In 1933, for the first time in 16 years, the two nations exchanged representatives. In 1937, Japan, at war with China, attacked a US river gunboat, the USS Panay, on the Yangtze River, killing two US citizens. This event infuriated the American public as well as the Roosevelt Administration. However, the US protested the Japaneseaction rather than demanding action taken against them. Roosevelt used his diplomatic power and refused to recognize the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo in Northern Chinauntil there was an official apology. Shortly after Roosevelts statement, Japan made an officialapology to the US and offend to pay for the damages in full. Although Roosevelt set his sights upon a global society, many Americans disagreed. This school of thought led to the Neutrality Acts of the 1930s. These acts, passed by Congress, prohibited the US from furnishing weapons or supplies to anynation at war. President Roosevelt hoped that any more of these laws that would be enacted inthe future would allow more flexibility. He disliked the fact that these Acts treated all nations the same, whether a country had attacked another or not. World War II began on September 1, 1939, when Germany invaded Poland. Still,many Americans did not agree that the situation was as dangerou